|
|
Pick from More Themes
John Haber
in New York City
Preceding ideas!
Must art serve or fight back?
Traditionally, art holds out a pristine world of beauty. It serves God and princes, but it stands apart from politics, science, and culture. Can this age recover the connections? Must gallery politics and museum empires mirror national and global ones?
Practice My reviews discuss some other outsiders in art, particularly blacks and Jews:
- Art and the Cultural Revolution
- Linking love, war, sex, and violence
- From slavery to Katrina's devastation
- Why artists are trashing Chelsea
- "The Price of Everything" in art
- An alternative space still "Not for Sale"
- Manet to Picasso, facing a firing squad
- A black artist's roller-coaster ride
- An accidental masterpiece of advertising
- Blackness, whiteness, and abstraction
- The "Frequency" of emerging black art
- Textbooks face the "language police"
- Whose political life is this anyway?
- Money swears—and even gossips
- At the Modern, who is paying for all this?
- Claiming nature for the American flag
- Monuments between ground and sky
- Galleries as fragile institutions
- Paul Kos's red pawn in their game
- The primitive's "American Effect"
- Beckmann and a nation's masks
- An official language of grieving
- Wrestling with blackness freestyle
- Modernism's evil empires?
- "Mirroring Evil" or absorbing it?
- Barney's video art as blockbuster
- A Romantic plays museum politics
- How many lives had Anthony Blunt?
- Abramovic's terrifying ocean view
- Claude, Poussin, and their world
- Between ritual and performance
- Surrealism's sex and violence
- Gestures toward the Enlightenment
- Evans and the underside of America
- Lawrence narrates black history
- Vermeer and a city's dreams
- The museum as muse
- An "American century"?
- The Renaissance, "high" and "low"
- Art's carnival and marketplace
- Soviet bureaucracy and the NEA
- Powerlessness after an election
- An alternative space . . .
- . . . or just another museum?
|
|
How good is video and computer art?
I used to think of video as the tedious side of art—the installations one waits on line to enter. If some artists get their way, I might never even come to the museum, and if I have to wait, I had better blame it on my ISP. But if the revolution will not be televised, are new media truly a postmodern revolution?
|
Practice As a critic in a new medium, I have to take in the world in pixels. Yet I consistently find video suspiciously old-fashioned:
Is the best art a fake?
Nothing is dearer to me than the creative act. Yet art history describes commissions and workshops, tradition and influence, copies and multiple castings. Pop and Minimalism even take their life from mass production. So are critics right when they look past the whole idea of authenticity?
Practice Instead of seeing through it, maybe they should see what it means. My reviews argue that originality always matters, but its meaning changes historically:
- Photography, staged or observed
- Prince locates the real America
- Critics, catalogs, and Pollock as fakes
- Dada as everyone and no one
- From the Morgan Library to the future
- Still life, still lives, and one real tree
- Channeling Abstract Expressionism
- Authenticity and perversity
- Who stole the unfinished print?
- Tarantino, Fellini, or video art?
- Goltzius's Post-Renaissance copies
- Spain, France, and art's canon
- Drawing Leonardo back from myth
- A book with many masters
- El Greco keeps copying himself
- Bits of novelty and appropriations
- The artist as project manager
- Campin's individual and the sacred
- "The Draftsman's Art"
- van Gogh's doctor tries to get it
- The workshop, and the art world
- So who painted the Assisi frescos?
- Two artists' hand-made books
- Abstract art as Ex-AbEx
|
|
Who lies behind art's images?
Art is so obviously a thing, but it holds out tantalizing hints of the human presence. It expresses the artist; it represents people and angels; it awaits a viewer to enter its installation and its rituals. Postmodernism promises to uncover the history behind each of these images. How well does it do?
|
Practice My reviews argue for remembering the presences in a work of art, but always as the humanity of a fiction:
jhaber@haberarts.com
| |